Go to the front page
   about | contact | explanatory notes previews | reviews | articles | newsletters   
Signing in is not required at Globeform.com. However, by registering as a Globeform user, you will receive important news and information for big meetings and races in Globeform's Newsletters, and be able to purchase access to premium content.

Membership is free of charge, so sign up now!



Is your membership activated? If not, please refer to the activation email you received when signing up, or contact us for assistance.

Lost your login details? Click here to recover your membership!



Globeform Specials


Dubai W'Cup 13
B Cup 2012
Belmont Day 12
KyDerby 2012
Dubai W'Cup '12

B'Cup 2011
Champions Day
Royal Ascot
KyDerby 2011
Dubai W'Cup 11
B'Cup 2010
Arc Special 2010
July Meeting
Racing Manual

Royal Ascot
GF Ascot Guide
Preakness Day

Dubai W'Cup 10

Hong Kong Int 09
Breeders' Cup 09
Royal Ascot 09
Preakness Day
Ky Derby W'end

D W Cup 09
Super Thursday
DIRC 2009

Big 'Cap day 09

Hong Kong Int 08
Breeders' Cup 08
Royal Ascot 08
Kent Derby 08
50 To Follow 08
D W Cup 08

Globeform 2007
US Juveniles 07
Euro Juveniles 07
Hong Kong Int 07
B Cup Special 07
Arc Weekend 07
Million Day 07
Royal Ascot 07
Belmont Day 07
Derby W'end 07
US T' Crown 07
Ky Dy/Guineas 07
D W Cup 07
Santa Anita Spring
Gulfstream Spring

Hong Kong Int 06
Breeders' Cup 06
BC Countdown 06
Arc Weekend 06
  Royal Ascot 06
Derby W'end 06
US T' Crown 06
Ky Dy Week 06
D W Cup 06

Breeders' Cup
Japan Racing Association
The Hong Kong Jockey Club
Cox Plate
Dubai World Cup

The Belmont – it’s the weakest link
by Geir Stabell / Globeform
Printer-friendly version

Take a look at these names: Thomas Jo, Sunday Break, Royal Assault, Nolan’s Cat, Indy Storm and Sunriver. Have you heard of them all? Probably not. Can you guess what they have in common?

Well, remembering that Sunriver hit the board in Belmont Stakes a year ago, you may guess that’s what they all did. Correct, and the six did so within the last ten years. They had all done precious little going into the final leg of the Triple Crown where they all boosted the trifecta and superfecta payoffs. What did they achieve afterwards? Well, let’s put it this way; they all went on the ”reported missing” list.

How could these unknown runners make it into the top three in the Belmont? The answer is quite simple. The Belmont may be the serious stamina test in the series – but is also so often the weakest race.

This year may be different. Very different, as Curlin, Hard Spun and the filly Rags to Riches are all possible starters. This trio should, of course, scare away the ‘no-hopers’ but the history of the Belmont invites connections of longshots to have a go. Let’s examine the third leg of the Triple Crown.

The Belmont is the only Grade One event over 1 ½ miles on dirt in North America. That in itself makes the race quite unique. In addition, it is contested by 3-year-olds only, and it is often the one event where would be Triple Crown winners fail. How can that be, when – as we see from the list above – it is also a race where relatively ordinary runners manage to finish in the top three? Good question. Particularly since there seems to be another difference separating this event from the two first legs of the Triple Crown. The Derby and Preakness has also, on many occasions, had big priced horses hitting the board. But normally they are horses who are on the way up, improvers who confirm the form later. Normally such horses in the Belmont do not. Even not a shock winner, like Sarava. He won at 70-1 in 2002, and did very little afterwards. He was ‘king for a day’.


As the Belmont field is often small, gamblers want to try trifectas or superfectas. Backing the winner or hitting the exacta is not likely to produce a strong ”over the odds” payout, as is so often the case in the Derby. It is tricky, however, to spot the right longshot to include in these wagering plans, when even a shrewd eye for an improver may not get you anywhere. We have to expect the unexpected. Last year we nailed the Superfecta with a low cost plan based on two horses with guaranteed stamina; Jazil, who won, and Steppenwolfer, who ran fourth. It was an unusually easy ‘Super’, It is not often we have a Belmont with two solid stayers and a good pace scenario.

In an attempt at making some sense of the race, why not take a look at the last ten editions. Just before we get into this, however, let me remind you of one new factor this year. The artificial surfaces. We have seen that horses with turf form do well over Polytracks and Cushion tracks. As we also know that turf runners often stay further than the traditional dirt performers, there may be a case for believing that horses that have done well on artificial surfaces will be well suited to running 1 ½ miles on dirt.

Sarava had been racing on turf in England (and been downright moderate) before his 3yo season. Go And Go, the Irish trained Belmont winner back in 1990, had also raced on turf – and done so to G3 level. This is a complex matter, and not one space allows us to go into here. If horses with turf / artificial surface form fit in well, it probably has to do with breeding. Keep an eye on any combinations of such factors. If a horse exits artificial races in the Belmont and he is also stoutly bred, he may be the one to light up the board.


The past ten Belmont winners can be classified into two categories.
First, those who possessed high class and stamina:

Afleet Alex

Empire Maker

Point Given

Lemon Drop Kid

Victory Gallop

Touch Gold

Then we have three horses who simply won the race through stamina, on a day when the class horses did not stay the distance;




One name is missing, Commendable, who beat Aptitude seven years ago. Aptitude was a better horse, he proved that both before and after the Belmont, and he stayed just as well as Commendable. The Lukas trainee got away with slow early fractions though, and that was how he managed to pull it off. Sometimes riders have too much respect for the Belmont distance, and this was exactly what happened on Commendable’s biggest day. US racing fans are spoilt when it comes to stats and vital information, such as riders’ results overall, at that track, at that meet and so on. If you can get a hold of stats that show which riders have done best in races over 1 ¼ miles or further, use it in your handicapping of the Belmont.


How does the betting normally go in the Belmont? That depends most of all on one factor; is there a horse chasing the Triple Crown in the field. If there is, he will be overbet, and you can get good value on the others. As mentioned, the biggest price in recent years was 70-1, but also Lemon Drop Kid’s price was huge, as he won at 30-1. He had been ninth in the Kentucky Derby on his most recent start. Twelve months later, we saw the aforementioned Commendable cause a similar upset, at 18-1. He had finished only eighth at Churchill. This complicates matters even more, as we just found out that a horse that was well beaten at Churchill Downs, where premium is very much on stamina, can win over 1 ½ miles at Belmont.

Sometimes when one is looking for trends, one finds little or nothing of use. And we tend to be disappointed in our own work. Don’t be. Maybe it is quite simply because there are no solid, reliable trends to be found. I feel the Belmont is, to a certain extent, such a race. It is an oddity in the North American racing calendar. Think about it. The horses that run in the Belmont have all been through spring preps over a mile, 1 1/16 miles, some 1 1/8 miles, then had just the one stamina test in their lives; in the Derby. When they get to the Belmont, it is not only the first time they try the distance. It is the only time they run over 1 ½ miles! Which means that, any clues to the puzzle are unlikely to be found in results achieved by Belmont runners after the big race.

Horses as different as Thomas Jo (no, no, no… his name was not ”Thomas Who”...) and Funny Cide have filled third spot in the Belmont. This makes the Trifecta betting tough. And, before you get on the email and ask ”how bad was the Belmont when this Thomas Jo ran third?”...

This is how bad it was: He checked in behind Victory Gallop, whose nose ruined Real Quiet’s Triple Crown dream in 1998. These two had filled the exacta also in the Derby and the Preakness. Yet, the soon to be forgotten Thomas Jo ran third behind these heavyweights. Who was he? He was a useful horse, a gelding, but he was well below top class. He won the Sir Barton and Tesio Stakes, and he was named Texas Horse of The Year. Mainly thanks to his third in the Belmont, where he earned $110,000. That’s the kind of race this is. Occasionally, horses are handsomely rewarded just for turning up.

Can it sometimes be the same for gamblers? Oh, how I wish!

Geir Stabell


Last update: 2007-06-05 05:36:59 (First published: 2007-06-05 05:25:40 )

If you are not already a Globeform Member, sign up for a membership! If you encounter any problems, please contact us for for assistance.

Stefano Grasso - Real Time Images

Copyright (c) Globeform, 2001-2012